Publications:

With a social network adjacency matrix constructed from the Facebook Social Connectedness Index (SCI), this paper examines whether social learning facilitates climate risk perception updates to inform climate adaptation. We find that Hurricanes Harvey and Irma-induced regional flooding increased flood insurance policies nationwide to the extent of each county's social network proximity to the flooded areas, with a corresponding update in climate risk perception. Social learning resulted in an additional 250,000 policies in flooded counties and 81,000 policies in unflooded counties over 3 years. We find evidence of the salience effect but no support for adverse selection or over-insurance. 


and knowledge. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 180, 883-902.


The demand for voluntary individual lifetime annuities is low, as merely 10% of soon-to-be retired Canadians care to buy such contracts. To assess the reasons why, we design a stated-preference experiment in which we vary characteristics of annuity contracts to estimate individuals’ sensitivity to an annuity’s money’s worth (that is, the value-to-cost ratio). Using different measures of longevity risk and survival expectations, we investigate how knowledge of annuity products and mortality risk misperceptions affect the take-up and the sensitivity of the demand for annuities. We find that annuities are objectively actuarially neutral in general (meaning that annuity premiums are equal to their expected payment), and can appear to offer great value for the money given an individual’s subjective mortality risk. We also find that demand is somewhat price-inelastic so that lowering the price of annuities could increase demand by at most 2 percentage points for a base of 10%. Lack of knowledge of annuities explains another 0.8 percentage points. We find limited additional interest for deferred annuities compared to immediate annuities, although respondents are less sensitive to deferred annuity prices. 

Working Papers:

Persons of color are more likely to live in high flood risk areas. African American and Hispanic individuals also pay significantly more than whites for equivalent housing, and there is significant spatial heterogeneity in these differentials. Do racial housing price differentials vary in ways that could incentivize persons of color to live in high flood risk areas? What factors exacerbate or alleviate differentials in safe versus risky areas? I assemble a dataset combining a panel of 26M repeat-sales housing transactions, buyer race, and flood zone changes between 2000-2020 across the United States. I identify price differentials by race and flood zone status using a repeat-sales model and plausibly exogenous changes in flood zone status at the property-level. I find that, while persons of color pay over 3% more than white buyers for equivalent housing outside flood zones, these premiums are reduced to approximately 1% inside flood zones. Where flood risk is most salient and supply of safe housing is lowest, premiums for Black and Hispanic buyers to live in safe areas are highest, reaching approximately 5%. Using variation in the supply of safe housing at the county-level, I find that all buyers pay a premium for safe housing in counties with large shares of unsafe housing. However, Black and Hispanic buyers face double the price premium of an equivalent white buyer in such counties. As climate change continues to make more areas vulnerable to natural disasters, access to safe housing for minorities may be further restricted, reinforcing inequality. Flood mapping as is currently designed in the United States may contribute to environmental injustice.

We report evidence from the largest study of racial price differentials in the U.S. housing market, constructing a panel of 40 million repeat-sales transactions. We find that price premiums facing Black and Hispanic homebuyers are ubiquitous and systematically higher in neighborhoods with a larger share of non-white residents. We find that non-white buyers purchase at a premium from sellers from a different group. Consistent with predictions from theoretical models (Becker, 1957), we find higher premiums in supply-constrained markets. Leveraging exogenous variation in racial segregation, we find that segregation increases price premiums paid by Black homebuyers. 

This study explores the impact of flood insurance on post-flood housing prices. Using a shift-share instrumental variable approach that exploits peers' flood exposure, we find that a $1,000 increase in flood insurance claims per single-family household in the Census tract boosts housing prices by 1.2% after Hurricane Harvey in Houston, roughly $3,064 based on median housing values.  While median homeowners in affected areas see a 2% price decline after flooding, households in flooded neighborhoods at the 75th percentile of flood insurance claims experience no such decrease.  Moreover, uninsured homes benefit from positive spillover effects and disadvantaged neighborhoods experience greater benefits from flood insurance claims. We also find suggestive evidence that well-insured tracts have fewer foreclosed properties, more home remodeling, and higher listing prices post-flood.

Effective climate adaptation depends not only on direct risk exposure but also on how communities reassess vulnerability in response to disasters elsewhere. We present a novel framework for mapping cross-regional disaster attention spillovers, using Hurricane Ida and Twitter data as a case study. Leveraging a high-dimensional VAR model with forecast error variance decomposition, we estimate a dynamic attention network capturing the direction and intensity of interregional spillovers. This emergent network reflects latent social and emotional ties, not platform-defined topology. Our findings reveal hurricane-hit regions as hubs of attention, while many high-risk areas remain peripheral –highlighting blind spots critical for equitable resilience.

Work in Progress: